英文学术论文引言的多维学科对比分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

H052

基金项目:

2022年安徽省高校科学研究项目(2022AH051884)


A Multi-dimensional Analysis of Introductions in English Academic Research Articles
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    学术论文引言体裁由于其复杂的语篇结构和语言特点,一直备受体裁分析学界的关注。通过采用Biber的多维分析法,对比分析PLOS ONE开源学术论文数据库中语言学、机械工程、哲学以及物理学等4类学科共320篇引言的维度及语言特征。结果表明,不同学科论文引言在维度特征上呈现一定的相似性,如显性劝说程度较低、文内指称清晰、独立且语言整体较为抽象等,但在诸如第三人称代词、个人动词、被动结构和名物化等语言特征上存在显著差异,且这些差异与学科分类存在对应关系。这反映了不同类型学科由知识的探索、构建和共享方式构成的学科特性对学术语篇的语言特征具有强大的塑造作用。

    Abstract:

    Research article introductions (RAIs) have been attracting much attention in the field of genre analysis due to their complicated discourse structure and linguistic features. This study follows Biber’s multidimensional analysis to compare the dimensional and linguistic features of 320 RAIs of four disciplines: linguistics, mechanical engineering, philosophy and physics in the PLOS ONE database. The results show that RAIs of different disciplines display some similarities, such as the relatively lower degree of overt persuasion, clear and independent in-text references, and more abstract language style. However, there are significant differences in linguistic features such as third-person pronouns, private verbs, the passive voice, and nominalization, which correspond to the disciplinary grouping. The study confirms the fact that the disciplinary characteristics reflected by different types of disciplinary practice of knowledge exploration, construction and dissemination shape the linguistic features of academic discourse.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

祁亚伟,苗琳娜.英文学术论文引言的多维学科对比分析[J].上海理工大学学报(社科版),2025,47(6):529-539.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-01-12
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码